|
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
|
- WP:RFP redirects here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permission.
- Example
===={{la|The weather in London}}====
'''semi-protect'''. High level of IP vandalism. ~~~~
Current requests for protection
Place requests for either semi-protection, full protection, or move protection at the TOP of this section. Check here if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Repetitive, previously-blocked editor has returned after expiration of previous article protection..Dudesleeper / Talk 02:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection non-stop vandalism coming from various ips. Perhaps a long-time protection could do if I am asking for too much. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protection - An edit war seems to be on the verge of brewing again with this article, and thus, I think it should be semi-protected (for maybe a month like last time) before it really starts getting out of hand. I've pleaded that proper discussions take place before any full-scale edits are made, but one particular person seems to be ignoring this and also engaging in possible sockpuppetry using various anonymous IPs. I will be filing a sockpuppetry report on this person. In the meantime, though, I ask that semi-protection please be given before this situation gets out of hand again. Thank you. -- Luke4545 (talk) 02:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Long-time semi protect way too much vandalism these past couple of weeks. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection, continued page-blanking vandalism --Porqin (talk) 01:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Still has one more day before block expires.E Wing (talk) 00:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protect Long story short, I caught an IP messing up an article then AfDing it, article was kept, IP user is cheesed off and keeps posting on my user page. It happened on 3 May, I just caught it yesterday and they put it back a few minutes ago. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Strong semi-protect. Just about every un-registered edit in the past few weeks has been vandalism. Georgia guy (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 Semi-protected for one week. Malinaccier (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary full protectionRo098 (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 Declined This page, which you created, was deleted. Please review WP:CSD#A7 for the reason. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Protection - Vandalism: Can we get some protection please. It is getting ridiculous. 38 vandy attacks in the month of May so far. IP4240207xx (talk) 23:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- APPEAL: For Two weeks protection. IP4240207xx (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Declined No reason not to try 1 week first. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, after a further review, I decided to extend it to two weeks just as you were posting this. Acalamari 23:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High amount of vandalism since his marriage to Mariah Carey.DiverseMentality (Talk) (Contribs) 23:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Protection - Vandalism: Can we get some protection please. It is getting ridiculous. 30 vandy attacks in the month of May so far. IP4240207xx (talk) 22:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for one week. Malinaccier (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- APPEAL: For two weeks protection. IP4240207xx (talk) 23:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protect - This month, there has been quite some vandalism from various IP users. SchfiftyThree 22:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days. Tiptoety talk 22:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
semi-protection Vandalism.The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of five days. Tiptoety talk 22:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
semi-protection Vandalism.The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for 1 month.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection, She got a mention on the Opie and Anthony radio show, and their fans or "pests" have been dropping unsourced rumors about a possible romance between one of the hosts and Nicolini. They have also left vulgar comments (anal sex, penis talk, etc). It has been happening all day.
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. Its still bearable at the moment and can easily be watchlisted.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection , She is in the news for the f-word and IP's love that.Zginder 2008-05-15T20:25Z (UTC)
20:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Declined. Sorry, but there have been several constructive IP edits and relatively little vandalism. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Multiple IP vandal insults already. The last one is reproted..Prashanthns (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. Vandalism from a single IP, seems to have stopped, please report to AIV if it starts again. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protect. Edit war going on between two anonymous ip's. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 7 days. After 7 days the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks! --Marty Goldberg (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Temp/perm semi-protection. - Constant vandalism/fan rubbish that erupted the second semi protection expired. This article might need perminant semi protection much like the michael jackson article. Anyway, something is better than nothing. --Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 19:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanx, this will make things a lot easier. --Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 20:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
One month semi-protection. A probably COI-affected IP editor persists in gilding the lily by adding promotional material to this article. He has reverted my last attempt to make the article neutral. I'm only working on it due to the COIN report that was filed in April. While I could semi-protect the article myself, I think having a different admin do it would help persuade the IP editor that he should follow our policies. EdJohnston (talk) 17:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Ed, if the IP account is Ogre900, could we just block the IP and force the user to edit logged in? Or am I missing something? PhilKnight (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is probably a static IP, so if you want to go ahead and block it it's fine with me. I've just noticed some admins getting scolded for semi-protecting articles they've edited themselves, so I wanted another view than just my own. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 Done; 1 month by User:PhilKnight. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
semi-protect. Permanent high level of vandalism from IP addresses. Please apply indefinite semi-protection to pages per "Subject to heavy and persistent vandalism" rationale (WP:SEMI). See article history for details. Mieciu K (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Mieciu K (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
full-protect. Frequent user disputes over content and validity of edits. High level of user vandalism. --Relaxitaxi (talk) 09:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. CIreland (talk) 21:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection , Random IPs adding unsourced information. Has been protected before, but IPs continued editing afterwards.DiverseMentality (Talk) (Contribs) 05:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks. After two weeks the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
If you simply want to make spelling corrections or add information to a protected page that is not disputed, and you are not involved in any disputes there, consider simply adding {{Editprotected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. See the list of current {{Editprotected}} requests.
If you do want a page that exists unprotected, please try and ask the protecting admin first before making a request here. This is also not the place to dispute a protection.
Check here if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
unprotection , Has been semi protected since february. Perhaps time to see if anon vandalism will be kept at an acceptable level if the article is unprotected?.-Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 19:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Reluctantly Declined. I'm all for occasional trial unprotection of highly visible content, but the logs suggest this article will not benefit from it. I'd give it 24 hours before someone is back here requesting semiprotection, please, for the love of God :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
unprotection , Unprotect request, from current level of semi-protection. However it is likely that if vandalism picks up again, will be back with another semi-protect request. :(.Lyoko is Cool (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Declined. I'm not at all comfortable unprotecting an article with a history of off-wiki calls for mass vandalism, sorry. Feel free to contact Maxim (talk · contribs), the protecting admin, if you think it's really worth it. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- We have discussed this in the chanology talk page and the consensus there is to unprotect for a short probationary period. Z00r (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- OK, then: Unprotected. Godspeed. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Please unprotect and consider blocking if edit warring resumes. The article is on AFD, it is important that the article remain easy to improve while on AFD. Regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 10:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
(take 3) ArbCom has just clarified their position, so the edit war should be settled. Semi-protection may still be warranted to prevent vandalism. Z00r (talk) 04:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure they have clarified their position - Kiril has said it can be linked, FT2 has said it shouldn't be linked and James_F had sentiment with both. There is anything but consensus amongst the arbs about what to do. This isn't going to be sorted until there's a formal vote from ArbCom whether or not to allow the site to be linked (removing the restriction from the MONGO case) or not (keep the status quo). Ryan Postlethwaite 21:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Declined Just like the other request, no. Please stop requesting an unprotect of this insanely contentious article. Horologium (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Current requests for significant edits to a protected page
- When making requests here, either:
- Provide a good reason for a substantial edit to a protected page. These are only done in exceptional circumstances, or when there is very clear consensus for an edit and continued protection. Please link to the talk page where consensus was reached.
- Demonstrate that there is a clear dispute over a protected page, and that a specific dispute tag would be appropriate to add. Please link to the talk page where the dispute exists.
Note: Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add {{Editprotected}} to the article's talk page if you would like an inconsequential change rather than requesting it here, though most of these should simply wait for unprotection. See also: Category:Wikipedia protected edit requests
Please courtesy blank the above two pages, both of which are fully protected, per OTRS #2008051310027978. Thank you. Paul Yeratz (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested edit to add template code support for Japanese cinema task force. See talk page for exact diff requested. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done by CapitalR (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves •
|
