User talk:LaraLove 

This page looks best in Mozilla Firefox.
It takes a lot of courage to release the familiar and seemingly secure, to embrace the new.
But there is no real security in what is no longer meaningful.
There is more security in the adventurous and exciting,
for in movement there is life, and in change there is power.

User
Awards
BRC
Notebook
Contribs
Edit count
E-mail
User Awards BRC Notebook Contribs Edit Count E-mail
Jennavecia (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights)


Contents

Archives
2007: [Mar] [Apr] [May] [Jun] [Jul] [Jul 2] [Aug] [Aug 2] [Sep] [Sep 2] [Oct] [Oct 2] [Nov] [My RfA] [Nov 2] [Dec] [Dec 2]

2008: [Jan] [Jan 2] [Jan 3] [Feb] [Feb 2] [Mar] [Mar 2] [Apr] [Apr 2] [May] [May 2] [Jun] [Jun 2] [Jun 3] [Jul] [Jul 2] [Aug] [Aug 2] [Sep] [Sep 2] [Oct] [Oct 2] [Oct 3] [Nov] [Nov 2] [Nov 3] [Dec]


Les' copaque production

Hi, you speedied an article with alternative capitalization. I'm inclined to let the article stay or put it through AfD, but it's your prerogative to speedy this if you like. - Richard Cavell (talk) 08:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I speedied that one, too. The only EL was the company's website, and the details of how he and his wife took talented blah blah... He's been informed twice before that he should not be making such an article, which is blatant advertising with fluffed wording. Hopefully he stopped before he gets blocked. Thanks for the note. لennavecia 13:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello Jennavecia, my name is Ehsan, and I work at Les' Copaque Production. An associate of mine, Ida Rahayu was the one who posted the post about our company. Now I would like to assure you that we did not intend the post to be an advertisement of any sort, but since 2 products from our company, Upin & Ipin and Geng The Adventure Begins are already posted, not to mention a post about our company on the Malay Language version of wikipedia, we thought it would be fine for us to have our biodata on Wikipedia too. If it is not too troublesome for you, can you tell me why was the post is thought of as blatant advertising? We are trying to change the post to not be such, but since this is our first time posting something on wiki, I feel we do need some help with it. Thank you.

Also, I apologise if this is not a place to ask for such things. This is my first post on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehsanazhar (talk • contribs)

My best recommendation to you is to look at articles of companies similar to yours. Read about conflicts of interest, our requirements for using reliable sources for the purpose of verifiability, and our expectations for articles to be written in a neutral point of view. لennavecia 18:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Alan J. Baverman

Hi, thank you for your assistance on this article in the past. It appears that there may be some vandalism to this site. Please review and please provide comments. It appears that certain documented information keeps being removed even though it is sourced from a reliable entity (the U.S. Circuit Court).

Thanks you. Judicial information (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

The information removed should be restored. CNN.com and The Houston Chronicle are not self-published sources. لennavecia 18:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your review and input. Is there anything that can be done to prevent future vandalism? The article discussion page provides some insight. As always, you input and efforts are greatly appreciated. Judicial information (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Just revert, block, and warn (okay, the last one is really ignore, but you really should warn. :) If vandalism becomes unmanageable, you can request protection. لennavecia 23:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

U of C, CS

If you could take a look at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs page. The section titled "future growth and expansion" is not cited at all. I feel that it is not encyclopedic and should be removed pending a citation tag.Keystoneridin (talk) 05:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Have you attempted to find a source? Also, when requesting others view pages, as a courtesy, you should link those pages. لennavecia 06:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The whole article is pretty much unreferenced. Why pick out that one section? I tagged as necessary. لennavecia 06:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)