![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
User talk:Ben MacDui/Archive 5 |
could you not remove my material although it is unreferenced it is perfectly obvious that it would be staightforward for another editor to reference it in the first instance by merely look at the Act of Parliament which created the WA which is online. further debate on the implications of the differences between the WA and SP have been widespread inthe press and other political writings. i believe the normal procedure on wikipedia is for other editors to add references where it is possible thus gradually building up a fuller article, well that is what i have seen and i read a lot of articles. i also believe you have a non-neutral POV on this as you are a scots devolutionist, so you should perhaps refrain from editing the page unless something is quite blatantly wrong on there. not that i have anything against scotch devolution, btw could you please take TCB back before the cheviot curtain is sealed. ta verra much.82.27.221.233 (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
i have read your reply and appreciate your offer to assist in referencing
i have replied at length to your reply which was on the talk page for this ip, justifying including that material 82.27.221.233 (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thanks and i've already started making some of the changes you suggested —Preceding unsigned comment added by R33nicholas (talk • contribs) 04:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Great job on St Kilda; I also really like the additional map and the QF gun picture. Congratulations on an outstanding piece of work.
As it's evident you know something about the Scottish islands, I thought I'd ask you a question totally unrelated to the article in case you can help. As a teenager I read several books by a woman who lived in a small town or village on a Scottish island. The books were essays and sketches on village life; the sort of thing that might appear in a women's magazine. I'd like to read them again and thought that if by some chance they're well known you might know of them. If not, just ignore this note; and I look forward to reading more of your articles at FAC in the future. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
There is a book called "Living on an island" by Vicki Coleman, Thule Press (1981). From memory I think this may have been about Muckle Roe in Shetland and is a one-off, not a series. It's available 2nd hand on Amazon, but there is no review there. I doubt you are thinking of Katie Morag, the children's books by Mairi Hedderwick. If it's neither of these I suggest posting the same message to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scottish Islands. I don't know where you stand on the Constantine II hoo-hah (about which I know very little), but bear in mind that this project includes several Gaelic speakers. Hope this is helpful. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 17:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
You're most welcome! I didn't do much though, the real credit goes to you (of course). Congratulations. As to your offer, I appreciate it. Lately I've been hard at work on Domestic sheep. I've basically rewritten the entire thing starting in early November, and I'm now copyediting and fleshing out the details on certain subjects. Since I'm visually anal retentive, I've also been flip-flopping on image choice a whole bunch. It would be a great help to me to have a fresh pair of eyes. Thanks again, VanTucky talk 23:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I think the images are excellent. A few comments:
Feel free to 'badger' me again. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 15:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
A Happy New Year to you too, and a belated congratulations on the St Kilda article being promoted to FAC. It makes a fine addition to the collection. I was aware of Miralles' inspiration from the St Kilda Parliament and also from the Forth Bridge. Unfortunately I don't have any weighty corroborative evidence of this. My collaborator on the Scottish Parliament Building article Mcginnly was, however, a mine of information and reference on Miralles and his inspirations. Cheers Globaltraveller (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
That was a nice simple one to fix! There was just one category link which you hadn't changed from the WP Scotland template, and then I created the category at Category:Scottish Islands articles with comments. You can see the articles with comments in it now, and the comments should appear in the log on the next pass. Warofdreams talk 00:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Well done. I was so convinced the problem was the template I was looking in the wrong place! Many thanks. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 10:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
The abbreviation kWh is wrong because it violates requirements from international and national authority. Correct usage of measurements and abbreviations or symbols therefore are a matter of law. Unlike other areas of language, no amount of careless mistakes by those who don't know any better can make incorrect usage correct.
If you reintroduce this error in a context that suggest it is correct usage, I will immediately request comments. I have spent many hours trying to figure out the precise meaning of assorted letters that appear in technical works, and I will not tolerate actions that encourage people to make it harder than it already is. --Gerry Ashton (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Dear Gerry Ashton - I don't believe we have corresponded directly before. In all candour I find your tone bordering on the threatening, but I shall assume this is unintentional. The correct place to discuss my edits to watt-hour is of course on the article's talk page, and I will be happy to discuss the matter further there. Regards. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 19:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ben MacDui and a very Happy New Year to you. There's a new rollback feature that makes it easier to revert vandalism. There's a stupid bureaucratic process you can follow if you like, but since I disagree with it just let me know if you want it turned on, Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Most of Pedersen's stuff agrees with the Orkneyinga Saga forms, or ones that were already in there. H-S tends to go for the -øy suffix, which can be found in the modern Faroes, and in modern Norway, rather than the -ey suffix which can be found in modern Iceland. I suppose it depends whether we're talking about the etymology, or the probable last form. I don't think H-S is reliable on placename etymologies, this is definitely his weak spot... some of his history's a bit unusual too.
The best bet for looking up some of Shetland names would probably be Jakob Jakobsen's book, but I think he tends to use Faroese orthography. In some of the cases, there seems to be more than one Norse form, so I've kept both, with a "/" in the middle. I've done pretty much the same with Gaidhlig names, where there are variants. --MacRusgail (talk) 18:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi MacDui, I have a geography question for you and a favor to ask. The question first - I want to standardize the creek articles I work on and so I will be moving discharge out of the Geology section and into the Course section in Larrys Creek and White Deer Hole Creek (following your suggestion at Plunketts Creek (Loyalsock Creek)). My question is where to put the following two sentences (from Larrys Creek): "The USGS also estimated mean monthly and annual groundwater recharge at the Cogan House stream gauge. Using data from 1961 to 1977, the upper and lower annual recharge estimates were 18.1 to 14.5 inches (46.0 to 36.8 cm), and the greatest monthly recharge was in March, with 20.1% of the annual total.[21]" I can see moving them to the Course section with the rest of the discharge sentences, but since they refer to recharge, I wasn't sure if they were a bit better in Geology. I am going to add the names of the mountains in the drainage basin to Geology, as well as a new bit about drilling for natural gas in the Larrys Creek area - the deep shale is thought to hold lots of methane apparently.
The favor is only if you have time, but would you mind looking at Joseph Priestley House and helping with the peer review? We hope to take it to FAC soon, but a fresh pair of eyes would be appreciated. If you can't I understand and have someone else I could ask. Thanks in advance, yours Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ben, hope you are well. If you have time, what sort of background information do you think would to put Thomas de Rossy in context. Is any necessary? Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 08:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Is it conceivable that a man of this learning and self-confidence in 14th C Scotland was not from the nobility?
Congratulations on FLC for List of Shetland islands - just saw it in the Signpost. Thanks again too for your comments on Joseph Priestley House, which is experiencing smooth sailing at FAC. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
To go to, and edit, the Ulva comments, just add /Comments to the url when you are at Ulva's talkpage. I have no idea why the url in the banner is now weird. Lurker (said · done) 16:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The OS gazetteer marks them as more than farms, but settlements of some size (village, hamlet, etc. seem interchangable). The gazetteer has Hilton farms in Aberdeenshire (2 of them), City of Aberdeen (1), Fife (1), Perth & Kinross (1), Shropshire (1), and Vale of Glamorgan (1). The version I am using is the 4th edition (1999), ISBN 0-333-77029-3. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I suspected this was the culprit. Shapinsay indicates that the island has a population of 300. Balfour, Orkney is the main village and probably has a population of about 75-100. If you look at the OS map you can see that Hilton is a large building of some kind. The one on Bute is even more clear-cut here. There is no metalled road and if there as many as five people there I'd be surprised. This site seems to confirm it is a farm, although amazingly it has some small claim to fame via Leslie Crowther! Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 20:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| Thanks for your support, peer review and comments - Joseph Priestley House made featured article today! Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
|---|
Great stuff - congratulations to you both. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 20:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
--Archtransit (talk) 21:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello MacDui, thank you for the generous comment and effective encouragement. I omitted from my post to the board that I'm almost sure that I intend to contribute in this area, with a short delay before starting. I'm in the middle of a major change to a relatively unimportant article, Scotland-unrelated, as a self-introduction; and I feel the need to do some more preparation (style, writing a good article, etc). I'm then torn over the existing articles (and missing articles) on US unions and mining and mine wars, some of which are in such need of repair that I wish they weren't there at all (I have direct access to primary information, I already know how to obtain additional information, and I personally knew many of the participants on both sides of important "wars"). I probably should start there, but I'm more likely to start in Scotland, even though I am so far away that "even on a clear day I cannot see the Isles". By the way, as I've rummaged around in Wikipedia, I've been particularly pleased to see the concerted effort to achieve good Scotland-related articles. Best Regards, 24.178.228.14 (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello MacDui, I'm thinking that I'll be registering so that I can create articles and join groups of interest. I've been doing some prep and minor edits as a way to ease in. One such edit regards Braidwood, Illinois, named for the Scottish emigrant. A small favor, if you're interested ... could you make a quick scan of my changes (the talk page explains them; looking at pages of the old version and the new version would be easier than comparing via"diff"), just for format and such, and comment on them? If I'm going to create Scotland-related articles, it is my preference that style and format agree with the group's existing expectations. If your busy, never mind, and no response necessary. Regards, 24.178.228.14 (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm a bit busy at present but I'll certainly take a look in the next day or two. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi MacDui, we recently finally had the rare confluence of snow on the gound, sun in the sky (very rare this winter), and time for me to travel there, and I got some winter photos of Plunketts Creek. There is even a house and part of a bridge visible in this one. Thanks again for requesting these, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Well done sir!. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 22:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Now back where it started, at Rùm. I'll leave a note for the editor who moved it. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi McDui, I've taken Basin, Montana, as far as I can for the nonce, and I've left you a longer note on the article's talk page. Finetooth (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Thought this might interest you. It's from the P&J but did not appear in online version.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Picture here - [4]
A prehistoric rock carving, believed to be 5,000 years old, has been uncovered on a mountain bike trail near Lochgilphead in Argyll during recent storms. For years, the rock art has remained hidden and protected from the elements by a huge tree in the Forestry Commission Scotland's Achnabreac Forest, which was blown down three weeks ago. The rock is a rare discovery and is inscribed with a dice-like carving. It sits high above the mouth of Kilmartin Glen and directly overlooks the rock art previously discovered at Cairnbaan. Its close location to the other rock art sites, visual relationship with both sites, and the similar complexity of design suggests all three sites are connected. The new site may hold the key to understanding the mystery around the rock art in Argyll. Andy Buntin, planning operations forester with Forestry Commission Scotland in west Argyll, said: "We discovered the new rock art during a routine inspection of trees that had been blown down or uprooted during the high winds - so it seems this time the damage and disruption caused by the gales has uncovered something good. "The importance of the site and the reasons for the carvings remain a topic of speculation. "We do know that they date back to the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age. Initially, the carvings were found on boulders and outcrops of rock overlooking major routes, hunting grounds, water-holes and hunting spots. This suggests a link with herding or hunting wild animals." The rock is very close to the popular Fire Tower mountain bike trail. The Forestry Commission will reroute part of the trail to ensure the carving is protected and will open up access for people to view the rock.
Great stuff, and many thanks. I found an on-line report at forestry.gov.uk Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 17:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Could you please write a stub about Kurów in Scottish English here – just a few sentences based on http://kurow-wiki.openhosting.pl/wiki/en-gb:Kurow ? Please.
PS. Article about Kurów is already in 276 languages and dialects. If your village/town/city isn't yet on PL wiki, I can do article about it. (I'm first author of requests and this article have the biggest number of interwikis) Pietras1988 TALK 12:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Not so easily achieved I'm afraid. To the best of my knowledge there is no Scottish English wiki. En Wikipedia policy does not discourage the use of Scottish English terms in an article "that has strong ties" to Scotland, but there might be objections about a Polish article. The differences between English English and Scottish English are in any case likely to be few for an article of this nature. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 13:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
OK, pitty. Pietras1988 (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, according to WP:VERIFIABILITY The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Of course there's no ultimate difference between veriability and truth, although no-one has argued that to the writers of that guideline. If you've double-checked then that should be fine. Even most primary school kids get most basic facts just about right ... the problem for Moffat is everything else! Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 23:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
| Image:David,larry.JPG | My RFA | |
| Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!
Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Thank you MacDui for the addition to the article! I read something about this when I intially started developing the article, but lost the link. Thanks though, it is much appreciated. There are a few other places in the lowlands and on Kintyre that I have my eye on for developing too, but maybe not just yet! Thanks again, --Jza84 | Talk 00:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
You are most welcome, and congratulations on a fine article. I'm sorry I missed the FAC. If you think I can help out with anything, (especially Kintyre as it is an honorary island), just let me know. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 08:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Not knowledgable about bot stuff, but as it continued its existence at Talk:Isle_of_Skye/Comments, that looks likely. I'll need to watch out for that when moving articles in future. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 12:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks very much for taking the time to review the article. I've responded to your suggestions on the article's talk page. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 01:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please have a care in respect of Strangeway, he's emailed the foundation office in a state of some ire, and not without justification. Please do be careful to keep within the letter and spirit of WP:BLP, even if you suspect someone is perhaps less modest than they might be. Not to make a biig deal of it, I'll not be picking a fight with someone 3,111 feet taller than me... Guy (Help!) 15:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, MacDuff! Question for you ... planning to create at least one article on Scots in other countries. Oxford Companion to Scottish history has a series of such articles, so wikipedia should follow. The question is, what sorta naming formula do you think'd be best. E.g. Scottish people in Russia, Scots in Russia, Scotland and Russia, etc, etc? Doesn't need to be Russia (that's the one I'm doing in my userspace), could be Poland, USA, Sweden, etc. I'll ask Mais oui! too. All the best. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
'This is a Good Article. Please do not add uncited material to it. Many thanks. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 08:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)'
This has been added (and removed by yourself) by several editors - citations or not. Please do not treat the quality of the article as an excuse to exclude other information to be added to it - no pet articles on wikipedia!>Jw2034 15:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy Easter to you too! No idea about that I'm afraid, being a medievalist. On the knowledge I do have I'd presume such people if they existed and did that were coming from the Low Countries, where a lot of exiled Scots and English religious resided. That part isn't obviously cited. Note 54 is from Calendar of State Papers: Domestic Series, 1595–1597 which is a primary source [OR?], and Wallis, "Further light on the Molyneux globes", p. 307 in note 46 says nothing relevant. Did the author clear up where he got that phrase from? If he's taking it from the primary source, maybe "recusant" is just a word for Catholic or something and refers to forces whose lord was Philip II. It's beyond my sphere. If I had access to a big library I'd go check it, but just now I do not. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 08:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok - thanks for looking at it. It's already an FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emery Molyneux. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 08:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Sure, I'll take you on. Make a subpage in your userspace and write some info about yourself. I'll follow up. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not love) 20:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ben MacDui/Archive 5! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3).
|